♥FUNREALITY FORUM♥
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Post subject: Kids suffering from OSA have abnormal respirat

Go down

Post subject: Kids suffering from OSA have abnormal respirat Empty Post subject: Kids suffering from OSA have abnormal respirat

Post by KNIGHT RIDER CLUB Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:32 am

Post subject: Kids suffering from OSA have abnormal respirat
Washington, March 2 (ANI): A new study has shown that children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have abnormal respiratory-related evoked potentials, as compared to other children their age.

The study, led by Jingtao Huang, PhD, of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia at the University of Pennsylvania, signifies that children with OSA do not perceive their airway closing to the same degree that normal children do.

The research team said that their findings may elucidate why these children do not scale protective responses to upper airway collapse, but instead go on to develop OSA.

For the study, the researchers focussed on nine children with OSAS and 12 normal controls. The pioneering technique of respiratory-related evoked potentials was used to test upper airway perception in children with OSA. With this technique, inspiration is blocked for a fraction of a second, and the brainwave response to this occlusion is analysed.

"Normal children have certain protective neurologic responses which prevent OSA," said Carole L. Marcus, MBBCh, of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, senior author of the study.

"These include increasing their airway muscle tone in response to negative pressure, and arousing in response to a breathing load or high carbon dioxide levels. Children with OSA have blunted protective responses. They have been shown to have abnormal upper airway reflexes during sleep. Children with OSA have also been shown to have a blunted arousal response to respiratory stimuli compared to normal children, despite having normal arousals to non-respiratory stimuli," she added.

OSA is a sleep-related breathing disorder that causes your body to stop breathing during sleep. OSA occurs when the tissue in the back of the throat collapses and blocks the airway. This keeps air from getting into the lungs.

OSA is common in children, occurring in about two percent of young children. It can result in high blood pressure, heart problems, poor growth, and behavioural and learning abnormalities. The study appears in the March 1 issue of the journal Sleep.
for more
http://attichatti.blogspot.com
Spanking kids can cause sexual problems later in lifePost subject: Kids suffering from OSA have abnormal respirat Icon_quote
Washington, March 2 (ANI): A new study has shown that sexual problems can be attributed to a painful childhood, by finding that children who are spanked or have been subjected to some corporal punishment are more likely to have sexual problems as a teen or adult.

Murray Straus,co-director of the Family Research Laboratory at the University of new Hampshire, presented his new research findings at the American Psychological Association's Summit on Violence and Abuse in Relationships: Connecting Agendas and Forging New Directions held on Feb 28 and 29 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Bethesda,MD.

After analysing the results of four studies, Straus came to the conclusion that spanking and other corporal punishment by parents are associated with an increased probability of three sexual problems as a teen or adult - Verbally and physically coercing a dating partner to have sex; Risky sex such as premarital sex without a condom; and Masochistic sex such as being aroused by being spanked when having sex.

"These results, together with the results of more than 100 other studies, suggest that spanking is one of the roots of relationship violence and mental health problems. Because there is 93 percent agreement between studies that investigated harmful side effects of spanking, and because over 90 percent of U.S. parents spank toddlers, the potential benefits for prevention of sexual and relationship violence is large," Straus says.

A survey of more than 14,000 university students in 32 nations found that 29 percent of the male and 21 percent of the female students had verbally coerced sex from another person. Coerced sex involves insisting on sex when the partner does not want to, or threatening to end the relationship if the partner does not have sex. The percentages of those who physically forced sex were much lower: 1.7 percent of the men and 1.2 percent of the women said they had used physical force, such as holding down the partner or hitting a partner to make them have sex.

"The most important finding of this study is that each increase of one step on a four-step measure of corporal punishment was associated with a 10 percent increase in the probability of verbal sexual coercion by men and a 12 percent increase in sexual coercion by women," Straus says.

"The relation of corporal punishment to physically forcing sex was even stronger. Each increase of one step in corporal punishment was associated with a 33 percent increase in the probability of men forcing sex and a 27 percent increase in the probability of women doing this," he adds.

In the second study, Straus analysed the same sample of university students, but focused on whether they had insisted on sex without using a condom. Straus found that 15 percent of the men and 13 percent of the women had insisted on sex without a condom at least once in the past year.

Using the four-step corporal punishment scale, Straus found that of the group with the lowest score on the corporal punishment scale, 12.5 percent had insisted on unprotected sex. In contrast, 25 percent of students in the highest corporal punishment group engaged in this type of risky sex.

The third study analysed data on 440 students in a New Hampshire high school. The students were divided into five groups, ranging from those who were never spanked to those whose parents used corporal punishment even when they were 13 years old and older. The study evaluated eight indicators of risky sex, such as more than one sex partner.

Straus found that students who had experienced corporal punishment had engaged in more risky sexual behaviour than students who had not been spanked. From this study, Straus concludes that corporal punishment weakens the bond between the child and the parents. He believes that this alienation from parents may make teenagers less likely to avoid sex and less likely to follow safe sex practices.

In the fourth study, Straus asked 207 students at three colleges about whether they had ever been sexually aroused by masochistic sex: imagining that they were being tied up when having sex, engaging in rough sex, or by spanking, and if they had been sexually aroused by actually doing these three things.

The study found that 75 percent of students who had been spanked a lot by their parents were sexually aroused by masochistic sex. In contrast, 40 percent of students who had never been spanked were interested in masochistic sex.

To reduce the use of corporal punishment, Straus recommends that the American Psychological Association, the U.S. Children's Bureau, and other organizations publicize a recommendation that parents should never spank.

"However, to make this work, we need to start by informing professionals who advise parents about the evidence-base for that policy. They need this information to be able to give appropriate information and help to parents about replacing spanking with positive discipline to correct misbehaviour," he says. (ANI)
for more...!
http://attichatti.blogspot.com


Spanking kids can cause sexual problems later in lifePost subject: Kids suffering from OSA have abnormal respirat Icon_quote
Washington, March 2 (ANI): A new study has shown that sexual problems can be attributed to a painful childhood, by finding that children who are spanked or have been subjected to some corporal punishment are more likely to have sexual problems as a teen or adult.

Murray Straus,co-director of the Family Research Laboratory at the University of new Hampshire, presented his new research findings at the American Psychological Association's Summit on Violence and Abuse in Relationships: Connecting Agendas and Forging New Directions held on Feb 28 and 29 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Bethesda,MD.

After analysing the results of four studies, Straus came to the conclusion that spanking and other corporal punishment by parents are associated with an increased probability of three sexual problems as a teen or adult - Verbally and physically coercing a dating partner to have sex; Risky sex such as premarital sex without a condom; and Masochistic sex such as being aroused by being spanked when having sex.

"These results, together with the results of more than 100 other studies, suggest that spanking is one of the roots of relationship violence and mental health problems. Because there is 93 percent agreement between studies that investigated harmful side effects of spanking, and because over 90 percent of U.S. parents spank toddlers, the potential benefits for prevention of sexual and relationship violence is large," Straus says.

A survey of more than 14,000 university students in 32 nations found that 29 percent of the male and 21 percent of the female students had verbally coerced sex from another person. Coerced sex involves insisting on sex when the partner does not want to, or threatening to end the relationship if the partner does not have sex. The percentages of those who physically forced sex were much lower: 1.7 percent of the men and 1.2 percent of the women said they had used physical force, such as holding down the partner or hitting a partner to make them have sex.

"The most important finding of this study is that each increase of one step on a four-step measure of corporal punishment was associated with a 10 percent increase in the probability of verbal sexual coercion by men and a 12 percent increase in sexual coercion by women," Straus says.

"The relation of corporal punishment to physically forcing sex was even stronger. Each increase of one step in corporal punishment was associated with a 33 percent increase in the probability of men forcing sex and a 27 percent increase in the probability of women doing this," he adds.

In the second study, Straus analysed the same sample of university students, but focused on whether they had insisted on sex without using a condom. Straus found that 15 percent of the men and 13 percent of the women had insisted on sex without a condom at least once in the past year.

Using the four-step corporal punishment scale, Straus found that of the group with the lowest score on the corporal punishment scale, 12.5 percent had insisted on unprotected sex. In contrast, 25 percent of students in the highest corporal punishment group engaged in this type of risky sex.

The third study analysed data on 440 students in a New Hampshire high school. The students were divided into five groups, ranging from those who were never spanked to those whose parents used corporal punishment even when they were 13 years old and older. The study evaluated eight indicators of risky sex, such as more than one sex partner.

Straus found that students who had experienced corporal punishment had engaged in more risky sexual behaviour than students who had not been spanked. From this study, Straus concludes that corporal punishment weakens the bond between the child and the parents. He believes that this alienation from parents may make teenagers less likely to avoid sex and less likely to follow safe sex practices.

In the fourth study, Straus asked 207 students at three colleges about whether they had ever been sexually aroused by masochistic sex: imagining that they were being tied up when having sex, engaging in rough sex, or by spanking, and if they had been sexually aroused by actually doing these three things.

The study found that 75 percent of students who had been spanked a lot by their parents were sexually aroused by masochistic sex. In contrast, 40 percent of students who had never been spanked were interested in masochistic sex.

To reduce the use of corporal punishment, Straus recommends that the American Psychological Association, the U.S. Children's Bureau, and other organizations publicize a recommendation that parents should never spank.

"However, to make this work, we need to start by informing professionals who advise parents about the evidence-base for that policy. They need this information to be able to give appropriate information and help to parents about replacing spanking with positive discipline to correct misbehaviour," he says. (ANI)
for more...!
http://attichatti.blogspot.com

KNIGHT RIDER CLUB
Moderator
Moderator

Number of posts : 1421
Age : 31
Location : Delhi, India
Registration date : 2008-03-30

http://www.funreality.com

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum